
The HERMES project deals with cultural heritage as a factor for local and regional development, hence its full title: Heritage and New Media for Sustainable Regional Development. The aspect of development is not only understood as economic growth, but is explicitly conceptualised also in terms of cultural activities of communities, and as an activation of the social sphere in general. Media, and new media such as the internet in particular, are regarded as an important means of conveying knowledge about heritage, to make people aware of the world they inhabit and of the narratives that are woven into the places we live in. Heritage is of course not to be understood as an ‘objective’ representation of the past, but rather as a way of looking back in time from the standpoint of the present.
One of the aims of HERMES is to gather young professionals from all the countries involved in the project, and to let them work on selected topics related to heritage. One such event was the 2nd HERMES Summer School dedicated to the topic of “Cultural heritage and the media” which was held on 13th-27th August 2005 in Weimar (Germany). The seminar focused on the role of media in the construction, promotion and use of cultural heritage, with particular reference to countries in transition in Central and Eastern Europe.
One of the main components of the seminar was a practical journalistic workshop in which the participants – several of whom work as professionals for the radio stations engaged in the HERMES project – produced their own programmes on specific themes in small work groups. The final products can be viewed and heard here.


This feature by N. Nedved, more than 26 minutes long, provides a portrait of the sixth edition of the regular Weimar summer courses which took place in August 2005. Featuring interviews with many participants from all parts of the world, it conveys the atmosphere of multi-culturalism, curiosity and openness which dominated throughout the two weeks of the summer school. In a rather implicit and subtle way, the programme also addresses some of the problems which one encounters when transgressing the boundaries of one’s own cultural microcosm – inevitable when 80 individuals from 29 different countries come together in one place! But the many cases documented in which people do not lose their interest and tolerant attitude towards what is new and alien suggests that antagonisms and antipathies are not inadvertent and inescapable.
From the very moment that we accept the existence of separate cultures, with a very complex and dynamic set of boundaries running in between, everything depends on our willingness to cross these borders and not to distance ourselves from ‘the Other’.
(Audio: ‘Let’s talk about culture, babe!’ – Impressions from the 6th Weimar Summer Courses) Click here to download the audiofile (12MB)

It is now common consensus that Buchenwald constitutes an integral part of Weimar. Located on the Ettersberg which rises above the town, Buchenwald was and is of enormous significance because it was the site of a German concentration camp (1937-1945), a Soviet detention camp (1945-1950), as well as the most important national memorial site of the former GDR. Today it is organised as a complex memorial landscape comprising all three sites.
This feature, with a playing time of more than 30 minutes, takes the unambiguous statement that Buchenwald has to be regarded as heritage as its starting point, even if it is an inconvenient and unpleasant one. This attitude explicitly includes the normative notion that the memory of the horrible events which took place near Weimar should always be kept alive.
Yet as soon as one accepts this view, a number of serious questions arise: How should such heritage be appropriately (re)presented, especially with regard to the very complex history of the place? How can a totalising narrative be avoided, thus permitting every individual visitor to develop his or her own reading and understanding of Buchenwald? Can we consider Buchenwald as the universal heritage of humanity?
Based mainly on interviews with other participants of the Weimar Summer School representing a diverse number of cultural backgrounds, as well as with professionals working at today’s Buchenwald memorial site, this feature poses crucial questions and brings the complexities and ambiguities to the surface which necessarily occur when dealing with the heritage of atrocity.
(Audio: Buchenwald as heritage) Click here to download the audiofile (14MB)

Most of the countries of the former socialist “Eastern Bloc” have undergone
fundamental transformations in the past decade and a half. Apart from political
and economic reform, these changes have also strongly affected the spheres of
identity, culture, history and tradition, for individuals as well as for
societies and nations. The transition from socialism to “post”-socialism has
made it necessary to reorder entire “worlds of meaning”, including the symbols
of the old system. With regard to these recent (and still on-going)
developments, the ways in which the past is commemorated, be it on an
individual, local, or national level, is of crucial significance.
Based on these general observations, the programme ‘Resurrected from ruins’
looks at the heritage of socialism and they way it is conceptualised and
represented in various countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Should the
recent past be forgotten as quickly as possible and all physical traces removed?
Should memory be kept alive, and if so: why, and how? This feature offers
insights into the thinking of heritage professionals, politicians, and ‘normal’
citizens, and it sheds light on the complexity and difficulty of finding an
appropriate representation of the socialist past.
The overall duration of this programme is 40 minutes.
(Audio: ‘Resurrected from ruins’ – Investigating the heritage of socialism) Click here to download the audiofile (18MB)
The feature discusses the situation of historical museums and memorial sites in present-day Croatia. There is no central museum presenting the history of the Croatian people from the socialist era as such, but a number of smaller sites where selected aspects of Yugoslav history are represented. Since the independence of Croatia, the focus on anti-fascist resistance which was previously predominant in museums has gradually shifted towards a more general approach to history. At present, only two sites are dealing with the life of Josip Broz Tito, one on the Brioni Islands, and the other in Kumrovec.
(Audio: Socialist heritage in Croatia) Click here to download the audiofile (4MB)
A young participant of the Weimar Summer Courses from Minsk in Byelorussia talks about the way how the heritage of the Soviet era is dealt with at present. Most of the statues of Lenin are still to be seen in the places where they were erected, and the names of streets and squares have also remained unchanged since the end of the Soviet Union. The interviewee argues that those remnants of the past should indeed be kept alive and not forgotten, but at the same time it should not lead to an uncritical glorification of the past.
(Audio: ‘Socialist heritage in Belarus (in Russian)) Click here to download the audiofile (2MB)
a compilation of symphonic music typical of the socialist era
(Audio: Socialist music) Click here to download the audiofile (3MB)
some pictures from Weimar – the HERMES group in action













